How long did you think about it before actually moving?
Bank Switching Research
Interviewer agent · 1.7K uses
You did not lose on rate. You lost on the four days it took to call back. Borrowers shop, and the comparison they actually make is rarely the one lenders model. Speed of response, clarity of costs, confidence in closing on time and whether anyone called them back all decide deals that look like rate losses on the report. This conversation reconstructs the real comparison.
Start from this conversation and adapt it to your team — change any question, add your own logic, and connect the tools you already use.
The core fields every response captures.
Always reconstruct the full comparison rather than asking why they chose the other lender
Ask what would have had to change for them to choose you
Follow-ups that change based on what people say.
If they cite rate, ask how large the gap actually was and whether anything else differed
If response speed decided it, ask how long each lender took to come back
Different paths for different answers.
Send response-time losses to loan operations with the timing detail
Route genuine rate losses to pricing with the size of the gap
Actions that fire the moment a response comes in.
Post weekly loss reasons to #lending in Slack
Update the opportunity record in Salesforce with the true loss reason
Alert operations when response speed repeatedly decides a loss
The conversation asks the borrower to walk through the comparison: who they approached, in what order, what they were quoted and what else they were weighing. It stays neutral and never names a lender. It probes response speed, clarity of fees, and confidence in the process as separate factors from the rate, and asks what would have had to be true for the decision to go the other way.
Select borrowers who received a quote and closed with another lender
Capture the full comparison set and the order they approached them in
Probe speed and clarity separately from rate so the findings are actionable
Route process losses to operations and rate losses to pricing
Static forms force complex situations into rigid dropdowns. Perspective captures structured data and the reasoning behind it — so your team makes better decisions, faster.
No context. No follow-up. No next step.
"Tell me more about the timeline — when did this start, and is there a deadline your team is working against?"
Extracted & structured automatically
Category
High-priority
Urgency
Deadline: 2 weeks
Sentiment
Frustrated but hopeful
Next step
Route to senior team
Right team. Full context. Instant action.
It is research with borrowers who obtained a quote from you and closed with someone else, reconstructing the comparison they actually made. It exists because lost-deal reporting in lending is unusually unreliable, and the default explanation, rate, is the one most likely to be wrong.
More lending templates for loan abandonment, post-closing and account applications.
How long did you think about it before actually moving?
Interviewer agent · 1.7K uses
What did you open that account for?
Interviewer agent · 1.1K uses
What did you use the branch for?
Interviewer agent · 1.9K uses
How did you first find out about the change?
Interviewer agent · 2K uses
What did the credit union do well?
Interviewer agent · 1K uses
How often did you hear from your adviser?
Interviewer agent · 1.6K uses
How lenders find out what actually decided a deal they did not win.

How banks close the gap between a satisfaction score and a fixable cause.
Read article
How a challenger bank rebuilt onboarding around conversation instead of forms.
Read article
How a member-first fintech uses conversation to understand financial intent.
Read articleReplace drop-off, poor qualification, and missing context with AI conversations that capture structured data and real understanding. Set up in minutes.
No credit card required • Cancel anytime