Evaluator Agent

Event and Conference Attendee Feedback

Session ratings cannot tell you whether anyone got what they came for. People attend events for a job: find a supplier, learn a specific thing, meet three particular people, justify the trip. Session ratings cannot tell you whether any of that happened. This conversation asks what they came for first, then measures the program against it.

Return attendance lifted
Program waste identified
Sales intent surfaced
Used 1,413+ times

What's inside this template

Start from this conversation and adapt it to your team — change any question, add your own logic, and connect the tools you already use.

Information it collects

Why they attended and what success looked likeWhether that outcome was achievedWhich parts were genuinely worth their timeWhich were not, and what they expected insteadWhere the value actually came fromWhether they would attend again and what would make that easy

Questions it always asks

The core fields every response captures.

  • Always ask what they came for before asking about any session

  • Ask whether they would attend again and what would make that easy

How it adapts

Follow-ups that change based on what people say.

  • If they came to meet people, ask whether they met them and what helped or blocked it

  • If a session disappointed, ask what the title and description led them to expect

Where it routes people

Different paths for different answers.

  • Send session-level gaps to the programming team with attendee type attached

  • Route attendees with unmet buying intent to sales follow-up

Automations it can trigger

Actions that fire the moment a response comes in.

  • Post attendee-type outcome summaries to #events in Slack

  • Update the attendee record in HubSpot with their job and whether it was met

  • Create a sales task for attendees who came to evaluate suppliers

SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certified. Responses are encrypted in transit and at rest, and you own your data. View our Trust Center.

How this AI agent works

The conversation starts with why they came and what a successful trip would have looked like for them. Only then does it walk the program, asking which parts were genuinely worth their time, which were not, and where the value actually came from, which is often the hallway rather than the stage. It closes on whether they would return and what would make that an easy yes.

Getting started

  1. 1

    Trigger within 48 hours of the event closing while the detail is fresh

  2. 2

    Capture the attendee type so results split by audience rather than blending

  3. 3

    Ask about the job before the program so sessions are judged against intent

  4. 4

    Route the findings to programming and to sales follow-up separately

Template Details

Agent Type
Evaluator
Replaces
Survey tools
Integrations
Slack, Hubspot, Email
Times Used
1,413+

Forms collect fields. Conversations capture context.

Static forms force complex situations into rigid dropdowns. Perspective captures structured data and the reasoning behind it — so your team makes better decisions, faster.

The static form

yoursite.com/intake
Category *
Select...
Details
Describe your situation...
Submit
Result:Category: "Other"|Details: "It's complicated"

No context. No follow-up. No next step.

  • Session rating surveys measure whether individual sessions were enjoyable, which correlates weakly with whether the attendee achieved what they came for.
  • Averaging ratings across a mixed audience produces a number that describes nobody, since a first-time attendee and a returning buyer came for entirely different reasons.
  • Standard feedback forms rarely ask what the attendee was trying to accomplish, so there is no benchmark against which to judge the program.

The AI conversation

"Tell me more about the timeline — when did this start, and is there a deadline your team is working against?"

Extracted & structured automatically

Category

High-priority

Urgency

Deadline: 2 weeks

Sentiment

Frustrated but hopeful

Next step

Route to senior team

Triggered: Slack alert sent| CRM updated

Right team. Full context. Instant action.

  • The conversation establishes the job the attendee came to do before discussing any session, so the program is judged against intent rather than against enjoyment.
  • It captures where value actually came from, which for most business events is the corridor and the exhibition rather than the stage, and that finding reshapes how the next event is designed.
  • Because it splits by attendee type, the result distinguishes a program that works for buyers from one that works for practitioners, rather than blending them into an unusable average.

What is attendee experience research?

It is post-event feedback organized around outcomes rather than sessions. It asks what the attendee came to accomplish, whether they accomplished it, and where the value actually came from. This is a materially different instrument from a session rating survey and tends to produce a different and more uncomfortable picture of which parts of an event justify their cost.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore More Agents

More templates for on-property spend, visitor win-back and post-stay feedback.

You rated the stay a 6. What would have made it a 10?

D

Post-Stay Survey

Evaluator agent · 1.9K uses

Did the way they handled it actually fix how you felt?

E

Service Recovery Survey

Evaluator agent · 2K uses

What did those first ten minutes do to the stay?

S

Check-In Experience Survey

Evaluator agent · 1.1K uses

Did you mention it to anyone at the time?

O

Room Quality Survey

Evaluator agent · 1.3K uses

Did the works actually affect your stay?

M

Renovation Impact Survey

Evaluator agent · 2.1K uses

Was the order right when you got home?

A

Drive-Thru Survey

Evaluator agent · 2K uses

Forms are costing you business

Replace drop-off, poor qualification, and missing context with AI conversations that capture structured data and real understanding. Set up in minutes.

Book A Walkthrough

No credit card required • Cancel anytime